WallStSmart

Abercrombie & Fitch Company (ANF)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 108% more annual revenue ($11.09B vs $5.34B). LULU leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 10.0%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. ANF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

ANF

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.21

LULU

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ANF.

LULUUndervalued (+70.5%)

Margin of Safety

+70.5%

Fair Value

$597.24

Current Price

$98.97

$498.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $597.24Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ANF4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
43.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 43.3% YoY

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ANF3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.8%4/10

4.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.622/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.9%2/10

Earnings declined 5.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ANF

The strongest argument for ANF centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ANF

The primary concerns for ANF are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ANF profiles as a value stock while LULU is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

ANF carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

ANF is growing revenue faster at 4.8% — sustainability is the question.

ANF generates stronger free cash flow (201M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ANF scores higher overall (64/100 vs 62/100). LULU offers better value entry with a 70.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Abercrombie & Fitch Company

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Abercrombie & Fitch Co., is a specialty retailer. The company is headquartered in New Albany, Ohio.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?