WallStSmart

AKA Brands Holding Corp (AKA)vsBurlington Stores Inc (BURL)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Burlington Stores Inc generates 1923% more annual revenue ($12.21B vs $603.56M). BURL leads profitability with a 5.8% profit margin vs -4.4%. BURL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

AKA

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.47

BURL

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AKAOvervalued (-9.9%)

Margin of Safety

-9.9%

Fair Value

$9.78

Current Price

$10.76

$0.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.78Overvalued
BURLSignificantly Overvalued (-23.9%)

Margin of Safety

-23.9%

Fair Value

$246.87

Current Price

$276.97

$30.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $246.87Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AKA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

BURL2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
95.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 95.9% YoY

Areas to Watch

AKA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$117.60M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.7%3/10

Operating margin of 0.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-32.0%2/10

ROE of -32.0% — below average capital efficiency

BURL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
8.7x4/10

Trading at 8.7x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.8%3/10

5.8% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
2.992/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AKA

The strongest argument for AKA centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : BURL

The strongest argument for BURL centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AKA

The primary concerns for AKA are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.26 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : BURL

The primary concerns for BURL are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.95 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AKA profiles as a turnaround stock while BURL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BURL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.42 — expect wider price swings.

BURL is growing revenue faster at 11.0% — sustainability is the question.

AKA generates stronger free cash flow (18M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BURL scores higher overall (63/100 vs 32/100) and 11.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AKA Brands Holding Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

also known as Brands Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Burlington Stores Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Burlington Stores, Inc. is a branded apparel retailer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Burlington, New Jersey.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?