WallStSmart

AKA Brands Holding Corp (AKA)vsUrban Outfitters Inc (URBN)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Urban Outfitters Inc generates 973% more annual revenue ($6.47B vs $603.56M). URBN leads profitability with a 8.8% profit margin vs -4.4%. URBN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

AKA

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.47

URBN

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 3.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AKAOvervalued (-9.9%)

Margin of Safety

-9.9%

Fair Value

$9.78

Current Price

$10.76

$0.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.78Overvalued
URBNUndervalued (+3.9%)

Margin of Safety

+3.9%

Fair Value

$73.36

Current Price

$82.18

$8.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $73.36Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AKA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

URBN4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
75.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 75.9% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
12.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AKA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$117.60M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.7%3/10

Operating margin of 0.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-32.0%2/10

ROE of -32.0% — below average capital efficiency

URBN0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AKA

The strongest argument for AKA centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : URBN

The strongest argument for URBN centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 10.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : AKA

The primary concerns for AKA are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.26 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : URBN

No major red flags identified for URBN, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AKA profiles as a turnaround stock while URBN is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

AKA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.

URBN is growing revenue faster at 10.4% — sustainability is the question.

URBN generates stronger free cash flow (301M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

URBN scores higher overall (71/100 vs 32/100) and 10.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AKA Brands Holding Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

also known as Brands Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Urban Outfitters Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Urban Outfitters, Inc. is engaged in the retail and wholesale of general consumer products. The company is headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?