WallStSmart

ACV Auctions Inc. (ACVA)vsRush Enterprises B Inc (RUSHB)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rush Enterprises B Inc generates 803% more annual revenue ($7.24B vs $801.34M). RUSHB leads profitability with a 3.7% profit margin vs -7.9%. RUSHB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D).

ACVA

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.47

RUSHB

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACVAUndervalued (+57.1%)

Margin of Safety

+57.1%

Fair Value

$16.78

Current Price

$10.50

$6.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $16.78Overvalued
RUSHBFair Value (-3.8%)

Margin of Safety

-3.8%

Fair Value

$62.98

Current Price

$56.76

$6.22 premium

UndervaluedFair: $62.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACVA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

RUSHB2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ACVA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.78B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-14.4%2/10

ROE of -14.4% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-44.15M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

RUSHB4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACVA

Revenue growth of 10.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RUSHB

The strongest argument for RUSHB centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : ACVA

The primary concerns for ACVA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : RUSHB

The primary concerns for RUSHB are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACVA profiles as a turnaround stock while RUSHB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ACVA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.76 — expect wider price swings.

ACVA is growing revenue faster at 10.4% — sustainability is the question.

RUSHB generates stronger free cash flow (51M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RUSHB scores higher overall (45/100 vs 32/100). ACVA offers better value entry with a 57.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ACV Auctions Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

ACV Auctions, Inc., operates a digital marketplace that connects buyers and sellers for online wholesale vehicle auctions. The company is headquartered in Buffalo, New York.

Rush Enterprises B Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?