WallStSmart

Target Corporation (TGT)vs17 Education Technology Group Inc (YQ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 100233% more annual revenue ($106.38B vs $106.02M). TGT leads profitability with a 3.2% profit margin vs -145.6%. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

TGT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47

YQ

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

TGTUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$119.45

Current Price

$122.57

$3.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $119.45Overvalued
YQUndervalued (+25.3%)

Margin of Safety

+25.3%

Fair Value

$4.62

Current Price

$2.35

$2.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $4.62Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$55.95B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
16.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

YQ2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.304/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

YQ4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$21.79M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-45.4%2/10

ROE of -45.4% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : YQ

The strongest argument for YQ centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : YQ

The primary concerns for YQ are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TGT profiles as a value stock while YQ is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TGT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

TGT is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

YQ generates stronger free cash flow (30M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 35/100). YQ offers better value entry with a 25.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

17 Education Technology Group Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES · China

17 Education & Technology Group Inc., an educational technology company, provides K-12 online education services in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?