WallStSmart

Target Corporation (TGT)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 2679% more annual revenue ($104.78B vs $3.77B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs 3.5%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

TGT

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.48

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

TGTUndervalued (+33.2%)

Margin of Safety

+33.2%

Fair Value

$171.51

Current Price

$125.25

$46.26 discount

UndervaluedFair: $171.51Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$56.89B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.444/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.5%2/10

Revenue declined 1.5%

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TGT profiles as a value stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 48/100) and 91.5% revenue growth. TGT offers better value entry with a 33.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?