WallStSmart

TransAlta Corp (TAC)vsXPLR Infrastructure LP Unit (XIFR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TransAlta Corp generates 89% more annual revenue ($2.27B vs $1.20B). XIFR leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs -1.0%. XIFR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.18. XIFR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

TAC

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.05

XIFR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

XIFRUndervalued (+75.9%)

Margin of Safety

+75.9%

Fair Value

$45.93

Current Price

$11.40

$34.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $45.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

TAC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.3%

XIFR2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
17.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-71.6%2/10

Earnings declined 71.6%

XIFR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.14B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
3.3%3/10

ROE of 3.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : TAC

The strongest argument for TAC centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : XIFR

The strongest argument for XIFR centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.38 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : XIFR

The primary concerns for XIFR are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TAC profiles as a turnaround stock while XIFR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

XIFR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.

TAC is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (17M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XIFR scores higher overall (51/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

XPLR Infrastructure LP Unit

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - RENEWABLE · USA

XPLR Infrastructure, LP acquires, owns, and manages contracted clean energy projects in the United States. The company is headquartered in Juno Beach, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?