WallStSmart

Southern Company (SO)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Southern Company generates 700% more annual revenue ($30.18B vs $3.77B). SO leads profitability with a 14.5% profit margin vs 11.9%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.60. SO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

SO

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.65

WAT

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SOSignificantly Overvalued (-47.7%)

Margin of Safety

-47.7%

Fair Value

$62.70

Current Price

$92.60

$29.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $62.70Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-84.6%)

Margin of Safety

-84.6%

Fair Value

$178.29

Current Price

$365.36

$187.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $178.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SO3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$102.01B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.8%

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.4%10/10

Revenue surging 91.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

SO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-0.8%2/10

Earnings declined 0.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.72B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SO

The strongest argument for SO centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : SO

The primary concerns for SO are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SO profiles as a value stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.4% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (-42M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SO scores higher overall (56/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Southern Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Southern Company is an American gas and electric utility holding company based in the southern United States. It is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with executive offices also located in Birmingham, Alabama.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?