WallStSmart

Schlumberger NV (SLB)vsCactus Inc (WHD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Schlumberger NV generates 3209% more annual revenue ($35.71B vs $1.08B). WHD leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 9.4%. WHD trades at a lower P/E of 19.8x. SLB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

SLB

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.13

WHD

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.58
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SLBSignificantly Overvalued (-222.7%)

Margin of Safety

-222.7%

Fair Value

$15.98

Current Price

$51.89

$35.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $15.98Overvalued
WHDSignificantly Overvalued (-245.6%)

Margin of Safety

-245.6%

Fair Value

$16.59

Current Price

$48.70

$32.11 premium

UndervaluedFair: $16.59Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SLB3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$75.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.49B8/10

Generating 2.5B in free cash flow

WHD3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.9%

Areas to Watch

SLB3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.634/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-28.6%2/10

Earnings declined 28.6%

WHD3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.0%2/10

Revenue declined 4.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.4%2/10

Earnings declined 15.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SLB

The strongest argument for SLB centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : WHD

The strongest argument for WHD centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 22.9%.

Bear Case : SLB

The primary concerns for SLB are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WHD

The primary concerns for WHD are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SLB profiles as a value stock while WHD is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

WHD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.29 — expect wider price swings.

SLB is growing revenue faster at 5.0% — sustainability is the question.

SLB generates stronger free cash flow (2.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SLB scores higher overall (54/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Schlumberger NV

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Schlumberger Limited is an oilfield services company. Schlumberger has four principal executive offices located in Paris, Houston, London, and The Hague.

Visit Website →

Cactus Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Cactus, Inc. designs, manufactures, sells, and leases a variety of wellheads and pressure control equipment in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?