WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsCactus Inc (WHD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 759% more annual revenue ($10.19B vs $1.19B). WHD leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 10.6%. FTI trades at a lower P/E of 27.1x. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.18

WHD

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$38.92

Current Price

$69.02

$30.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.92Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WHD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
93.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 93.9% YoY

WHD3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.5%10/10

Revenue surging 38.5% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.0210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

FTI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.2x4/10

Trading at 8.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.182/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WHD3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
55.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.4%2/10

Earnings declined 15.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WHD

The strongest argument for WHD centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 38.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WHD

The primary concerns for WHD are Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 55.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while WHD is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WHD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.

WHD is growing revenue faster at 38.5% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (277M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 50/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Cactus Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Cactus, Inc. designs, manufactures, sells, and leases a variety of wellheads and pressure control equipment in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?