WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsCactus Inc (WHD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 820% more annual revenue ($9.93B vs $1.08B). WHD leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 9.7%. WHD trades at a lower P/E of 19.8x. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FTI

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 9.3Quality: 5.0

WHD

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.58
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTIUndervalued (+15.8%)

Margin of Safety

+15.8%

Fair Value

$73.42

Current Price

$70.77

$2.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $73.42Overvalued
WHDSignificantly Overvalued (-245.6%)

Margin of Safety

-245.6%

Fair Value

$16.59

Current Price

$48.70

$32.11 premium

UndervaluedFair: $16.59Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
29.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

WHD3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.9%

Areas to Watch

FTI3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.184/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
30.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.4x4/10

Trading at 8.4x book value

WHD3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.0%2/10

Revenue declined 4.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.4%2/10

Earnings declined 15.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity.

Bull Case : WHD

The strongest argument for WHD centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 22.9%.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : WHD

The primary concerns for WHD are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while WHD is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

WHD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.29 — expect wider price swings.

FTI is growing revenue faster at 6.3% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (359M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (56/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Cactus Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Cactus, Inc. designs, manufactures, sells, and leases a variety of wellheads and pressure control equipment in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?