WallStSmart

TechnipFMC PLC (FTI)vsCactus Inc (WHD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TechnipFMC PLC generates 664% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $1.36B). WHD leads profitability with a 12.0% profit margin vs 11.3%. FTI trades at a lower P/E of 27.3x. FTI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FTI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 1.28

WHD

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FTISignificantly Overvalued (-89.0%)

Margin of Safety

-89.0%

Fair Value

$41.17

Current Price

$76.34

$35.17 premium

UndervaluedFair: $41.17Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WHD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTI2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
40.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 40.6% YoY

WHD3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
64.3%10/10

Revenue surging 64.3% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.0210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

FTI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
9.2x4/10

Trading at 9.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.282/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WHD2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
58.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTI

The strongest argument for FTI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : WHD

The strongest argument for WHD centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 64.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FTI

The primary concerns for FTI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WHD

The primary concerns for WHD are Return on Equity, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 58.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTI profiles as a value stock while WHD is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WHD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.

WHD is growing revenue faster at 64.3% — sustainability is the question.

FTI generates stronger free cash flow (488M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 58/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

TechnipFMC PLC

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

TechnipFMC plc is involved in oil and gas projects, technologies, systems and services. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Cactus Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Cactus, Inc. designs, manufactures, sells, and leases a variety of wellheads and pressure control equipment in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?