WallStSmart

Beauty Health Co (SKIN)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 16955% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $296.12M). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs -2.0%. SKIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.93. UL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

SKIN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: -0.38

UL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.20

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SKIN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.938/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
76.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 76 in profit

Market CapQuality
$134.34B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

SKIN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$109.36M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.9%2/10

ROE of -10.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.7%2/10

Revenue declined 6.7%

UL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

Debt/EquityHealth
1.913/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
11.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SKIN

The strongest argument for SKIN centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.93 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : SKIN

The primary concerns for SKIN are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 6.65 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are Price/Book, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.91 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SKIN profiles as a turnaround stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

SKIN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.08 — expect wider price swings.

UL is growing revenue faster at -3.2% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UL scores higher overall (46/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 18.8% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Beauty Health Co

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Edge Systems, LLC designs, develops, manufactures, markets and sells aesthetic products and technologies. The company is headquartered in Signal Hill, California with a location in Long Beach, California.

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?