WallStSmart

Beauty Health Co (SKIN)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 34735% more annual revenue ($104.78B vs $300.79M). TGT leads profitability with a 3.5% profit margin vs -3.2%. SKIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.93. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

SKIN

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.5Value: 7.7Quality: 5.0

TGT

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SKINUndervalued (+70.6%)

Margin of Safety

+70.6%

Fair Value

$3.60

Current Price

$0.85

$2.75 discount

UndervaluedFair: $3.60Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+33.2%)

Margin of Safety

+33.2%

Fair Value

$171.60

Current Price

$129.75

$41.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $171.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SKIN2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.938/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$58.08B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

SKIN4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$108.27M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.2%3/10

Operating margin of 0.2%

Return on EquityProfitability
-16.9%2/10

ROE of -16.9% — below average capital efficiency

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.414/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.5%2/10

Revenue declined 1.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SKIN

The strongest argument for SKIN centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.93 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : SKIN

The primary concerns for SKIN are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SKIN profiles as a turnaround stock while TGT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SKIN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

SKIN is growing revenue faster at -1.4% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (48/100 vs 45/100). SKIN offers better value entry with a 70.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Beauty Health Co

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Edge Systems, LLC designs, develops, manufactures, markets and sells aesthetic products and technologies. The company is headquartered in Signal Hill, California with a location in Long Beach, California.

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?