WallStSmart

Royal Bank of Canada (RY)vsStifel Financial Corporation (SF)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Royal Bank of Canada generates 1059% more annual revenue ($65.72B vs $5.67B). RY leads profitability with a 33.7% profit margin vs 15.6%. SF appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.01. SF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

RY

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 8.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.50

SF

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 6.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.55

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

RY6 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$299.37B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Profit MarginProfitability
33.7%10/10

Keeps 34 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
45.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 45.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$20.82B10/10

Generating 20.8B in free cash flow

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.1%8/10

16.1% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

SF4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
469.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 469.2% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
15.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.6%

Areas to Watch

RY3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.344/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.502/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
2.771/10

Elevated debt levels

SF2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$-390.42M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.552/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : RY

The strongest argument for RY centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 33.7% and operating margin at 45.3%. Revenue growth of 16.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SF

The strongest argument for SF centers on EPS Growth, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 21.6%. Revenue growth of 14.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : RY

The primary concerns for RY are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.77 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SF

The primary concerns for SF are Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RY profiles as a growth stock while SF is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

SF carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

RY is growing revenue faster at 16.1% — sustainability is the question.

RY generates stronger free cash flow (20.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SF scores higher overall (76/100 vs 67/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins and 14.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Royal Bank of Canada

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Royal Bank of Canada is a globally diversified financial services company. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Stifel Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Stifel Financial Corp. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?