WallStSmart

RTX Corporation (RTX)vsXPO Logistics Inc (XPO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

RTX Corporation generates 991% more annual revenue ($93.50B vs $8.57B). RTX leads profitability with a 8.3% profit margin vs 4.7%. XPO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.90. XPO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

RTX

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.58

XPO

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 2.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RTX.

XPOSignificantly Overvalued (-18.9%)

Margin of Safety

-18.9%

Fair Value

$169.79

Current Price

$182.18

$12.39 premium

UndervaluedFair: $169.79Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

RTX3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$266.42B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.7% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.59B8/10

Generating 3.6B in free cash flow

XPO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 52.8% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
20.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Areas to Watch

RTX3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.304/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
34.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.584/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

XPO4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.904/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
10.9x4/10

Trading at 10.9x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.604/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : RTX

The strongest argument for RTX centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : XPO

The strongest argument for XPO centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 13.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : RTX

The primary concerns for RTX are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : XPO

The primary concerns for XPO are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 55.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 2.03 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

XPO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.

RTX is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

RTX generates stronger free cash flow (3.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AEROSPACE & DEFENSE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

XPO scores higher overall (61/100 vs 59/100) and 13.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

RTX Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization. Raytheon Technologies (RTX) researches, develops, and manufactures advanced technology products in the aerospace and defense industry, including aircraft engines, avionics, aerostructures, cybersecurity, guided missiles, air defense systems, satellites, and drones.

Visit Website →

XPO Logistics Inc

INDUSTRIALS · TRUCKING · USA

XPO Logistics, Inc. provides supply chain solutions in the United States, the rest of North America, France, the United Kingdom, the rest of Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?