WallStSmart

Restaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 154% more annual revenue ($9.59B vs $3.77B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs 10.0%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.94. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

QSR

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QSRUndervalued (+33.6%)

Margin of Safety

+33.6%

Fair Value

$106.48

Current Price

$79.71

$26.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $106.48Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QSR4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
28.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 28 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.948/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
27.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.0%

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

QSR2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.94 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QSR profiles as a value stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (169M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (70/100 vs 52/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?