WallStSmart

Restaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 32% more annual revenue ($9.59B vs $7.27B). QSR leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs 3.6%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.94. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

QSR

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QSRUndervalued (+33.6%)

Margin of Safety

+33.6%

Fair Value

$106.48

Current Price

$79.71

$26.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $106.48Overvalued
RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QSR4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
28.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 28 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.948/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
27.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.0%

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

QSR2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.94 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RUSHA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (169M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor RESTAURANTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (70/100 vs 47/100). RUSHA offers better value entry with a 55.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?