WallStSmart

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)vsZiff Davis Inc (ZD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ziff Davis Inc generates 77247% more annual revenue ($1.45B vs $1.88M). ZD leads profitability with a 3.3% profit margin vs -1.5%. ZD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39

ZD

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.70
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMMM.

ZDSignificantly Overvalued (-302.3%)

Margin of Safety

-302.3%

Fair Value

$7.82

Current Price

$43.46

$35.64 premium

UndervaluedFair: $7.82Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

ZD2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%

Areas to Watch

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.0%2/10

ROE of -2.0% — below average capital efficiency

ZD4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.534/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
36.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.704/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$1.67B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : ZD

The strongest argument for ZD centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : ZD

The primary concerns for ZD are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QMMM profiles as a turnaround stock while ZD is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZD is growing revenue faster at -1.5% — sustainability is the question.

ZD generates stronger free cash flow (158M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ADVERTISING AGENCIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ZD scores higher overall (51/100 vs 14/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Ziff Davis Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

J2 Global, Inc. provides Internet services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?