WallStSmart

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (QMMM)vsTeradyne Inc (TER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Teradyne Inc generates 201725% more annual revenue ($3.79B vs $1.88M). TER leads profitability with a 22.6% profit margin vs -150.1%. TER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B+).

QMMM

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.39

TER

Strong Buy

75

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 9.5Value: 3.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QMMM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

TER6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
37.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.6%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
87.0%10/10

Revenue surging 87.0% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
314.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 314.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$55.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
28.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
22.6%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

QMMM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
519.1x2/10

Trading at 519.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-198.1%2/10

ROE of -198.1% — below average capital efficiency

TER3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.514/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
65.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
20.1x2/10

Trading at 20.1x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QMMM

The strongest argument for QMMM centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : TER

The strongest argument for TER centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.6% and operating margin at 37.6%. Revenue growth of 87.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : QMMM

The primary concerns for QMMM are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : TER

The primary concerns for TER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 65.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QMMM profiles as a turnaround stock while TER is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TER is growing revenue faster at 87.0% — sustainability is the question.

TER generates stronger free cash flow (200M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ADVERTISING AGENCIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TER scores higher overall (75/100 vs 14/100), backed by strong 22.6% margins and 87.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

QMMM Holdings Limited, provides digital media advertising and marketing production services primarily in Hong Kong.

Visit Website →

Teradyne Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?