WallStSmart

Qnity Electronics, Inc (Q)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Qnity Electronics, Inc generates 26% more annual revenue ($4.75B vs $3.77B). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs 11.9%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 5.0

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QOvervalued (-9.0%)

Margin of Safety

-9.0%

Fair Value

$105.09

Current Price

$143.59

$38.50 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.09Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

Q4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
2.862/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
43.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 43.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

Q profiles as a value stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

Q generates stronger free cash flow (420M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 49/100) and 91.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?