WallStSmart

Qnity Electronics, Inc (Q)vsTeradyne Inc (TER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Qnity Electronics, Inc generates 49% more annual revenue ($4.75B vs $3.19B). TER leads profitability with a 17.4% profit margin vs 14.6%. TER appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.65. TER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

TER

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QSignificantly Overvalued (-410.3%)

Margin of Safety

-410.3%

Fair Value

$22.44

Current Price

$112.02

$89.58 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.44Overvalued
TERSignificantly Overvalued (-98.5%)

Margin of Safety

-98.5%

Fair Value

$161.93

Current Price

$300.07

$138.14 premium

UndervaluedFair: $161.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

TER4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.9%10/10

Revenue surging 43.9% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
81.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 81.4% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

Q4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.294/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
34.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

TER3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.654/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
16.8x4/10

Trading at 16.8x book value

P/E RatioValuation
86.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bull Case : TER

The strongest argument for TER centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.4% and operating margin at 30.3%. Revenue growth of 43.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : TER

The primary concerns for TER are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 86.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

Q profiles as a value stock while TER is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TER is growing revenue faster at 43.9% — sustainability is the question.

Q generates stronger free cash flow (420M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TER scores higher overall (70/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 17.4% margins and 43.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Teradyne Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?