Patterson-UTI Energy Inc (PTEN)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy Inc
$12.27
-7.22%
ENERGY · Cap: $4.36B
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corp
$149.92
-4.13%
ENERGY · Cap: $619.92B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Exxon Mobil Corp generates 6891% more annual revenue ($326.01B vs $4.66B). XOM leads profitability with a 7.8% profit margin vs -2.6%. PTEN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.78. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).
PTEN
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D+
XOM
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+70.7%
Fair Value
$39.25
Current Price
$12.27
$26.98 discount
Margin of Safety
-82.9%
Fair Value
$81.96
Current Price
$149.92
$67.96 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 2.2B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
ROE of -3.8% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 12.7%
Earnings declined 97.9%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Moderate valuation
2.6% revenue growth
7.8% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : PTEN
The strongest argument for PTEN centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.78 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : XOM
The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : PTEN
The primary concerns for PTEN are Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : XOM
The primary concerns for XOM are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
PTEN profiles as a turnaround stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
PTEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.60 — expect wider price swings.
XOM is growing revenue faster at 2.6% — sustainability is the question.
XOM generates stronger free cash flow (2.2B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
XOM scores higher overall (50/100 vs 45/100). PTEN offers better value entry with a 70.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Patterson-UTI Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS DRILLING · USA
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., provides onshore contract drilling services to oil and natural gas operators in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Visit Website →Exxon Mobil Corp
ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA
Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS DRILLING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?