WallStSmart

PLDT Inc ADR (PHI)vsEchoStar Corporation (SATS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PLDT Inc ADR generates 1355% more annual revenue ($218.39B vs $15.00B). PHI leads profitability with a 13.7% profit margin vs -96.6%. SATS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. PHI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

PHI

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.63

SATS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.08
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PHI.

SATSUndervalued (+66.0%)

Margin of Safety

+66.0%

Fair Value

$323.23

Current Price

$127.15

$196.08 discount

UndervaluedFair: $323.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PHI5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
31.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.7%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$11.98B10/10

Generating 12.0B in free cash flow

Return on EquityProfitability
24.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SATS0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

PHI4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.4%2/10

Revenue declined 1.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.632/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

SATS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-111.3%2/10

ROE of -111.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-85.6%2/10

Earnings declined 85.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PHI

The strongest argument for PHI centers on P/E Ratio, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : SATS

PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PHI

The primary concerns for PHI are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : SATS

The primary concerns for SATS are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 4.40 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PHI profiles as a declining stock while SATS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SATS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

PHI is growing revenue faster at -1.4% — sustainability is the question.

PHI generates stronger free cash flow (12.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PHI scores higher overall (62/100 vs 34/100). SATS offers better value entry with a 66.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

PLDT Inc ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

PLDT Inc. is an integrated telecommunications company in the Philippines. The company is headquartered in Makati City, the Philippines.

EchoStar Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

EchoStar Corporation provides broadband satellite technologies and broadband Internet services. The company is headquartered in Englewood, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?