WallStSmart

PepsiCo Inc (PEP)vsSimply Good Foods Co (SMPL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PepsiCo Inc generates 6742% more annual revenue ($96.90B vs $1.42B). PEP leads profitability with a 10.8% profit margin vs -7.5%. PEP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.46. PEP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

PEP

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.26

SMPL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.0Value: 6.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.17
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PEPFair Value (-1.9%)

Margin of Safety

-1.9%

Fair Value

$140.22

Current Price

$143.50

$3.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $140.22Overvalued
SMPLUndervalued (+46.2%)

Margin of Safety

+46.2%

Fair Value

$30.54

Current Price

$10.25

$20.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $30.54Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PEP5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
47.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 47 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
137.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 137.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$185.30B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
17.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.50B8/10

Generating 1.5B in free cash flow

SMPL3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

PEP3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Price/BookValuation
9.2x4/10

Trading at 9.2x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Debt/EquityHealth
2.411/10

Elevated debt levels

SMPL4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.644/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$1.23B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.1%2/10

ROE of -7.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PEP

The strongest argument for PEP centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. PEG of 1.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SMPL

The strongest argument for SMPL centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : PEP

The primary concerns for PEP are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.41 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SMPL

The primary concerns for SMPL are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PEP profiles as a value stock while SMPL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PEP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.37 — expect wider price swings.

PEP is growing revenue faster at 6.4% — sustainability is the question.

PEP generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PEP scores higher overall (71/100 vs 46/100). SMPL offers better value entry with a 46.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

PepsiCo Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

PepsiCo, Inc. is an American based multinational food, snack, and beverage corporation headquartered in Harrison, New York, in the hamlet of Purchase. PepsiCo's business encompasses all aspects of the food and beverage market. It oversees the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of its products.

Simply Good Foods Co

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Simply Good Foods Company is a consumer packaged food and beverage company in North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?