WallStSmart

Plains GP Holdings LP (PAGP)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 620% more annual revenue ($326.01B vs $45.26B). XOM leads profitability with a 7.8% profit margin vs 0.4%. PAGP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.70. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

PAGP

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9

XOM

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PAGP.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-81.0%)

Margin of Safety

-81.0%

Fair Value

$81.73

Current Price

$145.26

$63.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $81.73Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PAGP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.708/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$628.25B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.23B8/10

Generating 2.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

PAGP4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
0.4%3/10

0.4% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PAGP

The strongest argument for PAGP centers on PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.70 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PAGP

The primary concerns for PAGP are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 9.09 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 0.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PAGP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.43 — expect wider price swings.

PAGP is growing revenue faster at 8.7% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (2.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PAGP scores higher overall (50/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Plains GP Holdings LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Plains GP Holdings, LP owns and operates midstream power infrastructure in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?