WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 51% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $6.90B). ZIM leads profitability with a 6.9% profit margin vs 6.2%. ZIM trades at a lower P/E of 6.5x. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82

ZIM

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OSKUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$259.60

Current Price

$147.37

$112.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.60Overvalued
ZIMUndervalued (+65.4%)

Margin of Safety

+65.4%

Fair Value

$61.02

Current Price

$26.01

$35.01 discount

UndervaluedFair: $61.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

ZIM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

ZIM4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-31.5%2/10

Revenue declined 31.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.2%2/10

Earnings declined 93.2%

Operating MarginProfitability
-2.0%1/10

Operating margin of -2.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : ZIM

The strongest argument for ZIM centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : ZIM

The primary concerns for ZIM are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ZIM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.46 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 3.5% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (48/100 vs 45/100). ZIM offers better value entry with a 65.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., provides container shipping and related services in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Haifa, Israel.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?