WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsLatham Group Inc (SWIM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 1789% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $551.81M). OSK leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs 1.6%. OSK trades at a lower P/E of 15.3x. SWIM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82

SWIM

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OSKUndervalued (+33.0%)

Margin of Safety

+33.0%

Fair Value

$260.30

Current Price

$153.06

$107.24 discount

UndervaluedFair: $260.30Overvalued
SWIMUndervalued (+42.3%)

Margin of Safety

+42.3%

Fair Value

$11.51

Current Price

$5.75

$5.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $11.51Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
15.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SWIM2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
39.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 39.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.302/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

SWIM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$682.14M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
2.2%3/10

ROE of 2.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
83.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : SWIM

The strongest argument for SWIM centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SWIM

The primary concerns for SWIM are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 83.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SWIM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.72 — expect wider price swings.

SWIM is growing revenue faster at 5.3% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (48/100 vs 48/100). SWIM offers better value entry with a 42.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Latham Group Inc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Latham Group, Inc. designs, manufactures and markets residential inground swimming pools. The company is headquartered in Latham, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?