WallStSmart

Omnicom Group Inc (OMC)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 192% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $17.27B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs -0.3%. UL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.91. UL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

OMC

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.76

UL

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OMC.

ULSignificantly Overvalued (-268.2%)

Margin of Safety

-268.2%

Fair Value

$20.26

Current Price

$60.80

$40.54 premium

UndervaluedFair: $20.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OMC3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.9%8/10

Revenue surging 27.9% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.00B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$132.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
15.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-10.3%2/10

Earnings declined 10.3%

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.914/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 27.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OMC profiles as a growth stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

OMC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.71 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 27.9% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UL scores higher overall (50/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 18.8% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?