WallStSmart

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc ADR (MUFG)vsTransUnion (TRU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc ADR generates 180046% more annual revenue ($8.51T vs $4.73B). MUFG leads profitability with a 28.5% profit margin vs 14.9%. TRU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.06. MUFG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

MUFG

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 0.37

TRU

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.52

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MUFG6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$227.34B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
39.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$8.09T10/10

Generating 8.1T in free cash flow

Profit MarginProfitability
28.5%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TRU1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
172.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 172.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

MUFG3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.372/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
3.521/10

Elevated debt levels

TRU2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.524/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.203/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MUFG

The strongest argument for MUFG centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.5% and operating margin at 39.5%. Revenue growth of 11.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TRU

The strongest argument for TRU centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 13.7% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.06 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MUFG

The primary concerns for MUFG are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.52 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TRU

The primary concerns for TRU are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MUFG profiles as a mature stock while TRU is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TRU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.55 — expect wider price swings.

TRU is growing revenue faster at 13.7% — sustainability is the question.

MUFG generates stronger free cash flow (8.1T), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MUFG scores higher overall (73/100 vs 72/100), backed by strong 28.5% margins and 11.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc ADR

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., a banking holding company, offers financial services in Japan, the United States, and Asia / Oceania. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

Visit Website →

TransUnion

FINANCIAL SERVICES · FINANCIAL DATA & STOCK EXCHANGES · USA

TransUnion offers risk and information solutions. The company is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?