WallStSmart

Morgan Stanley (MS)vsUniversal Health Services Inc (UHS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Morgan Stanley generates 312% more annual revenue ($73.17B vs $17.76B). MS leads profitability with a 24.7% profit margin vs 8.6%. UHS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.17. MS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

MS

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

UHS

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MS.

UHSUndervalued (+40.6%)

Margin of Safety

+40.6%

Fair Value

$389.40

Current Price

$169.96

$219.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $389.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$299.95B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
40.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.6%

Profit MarginProfitability
24.7%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.3%8/10

16.3% revenue growth

UHS3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
21.4%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Areas to Watch

MS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.334/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-7.85B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

UHS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MS

The strongest argument for MS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.7% and operating margin at 40.6%. Revenue growth of 16.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UHS

The strongest argument for UHS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MS

The primary concerns for MS are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : UHS

No major red flags identified for UHS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MS profiles as a growth stock while UHS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

MS is growing revenue faster at 16.3% — sustainability is the question.

UHS generates stronger free cash flow (184M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 72/100), backed by strong 24.7% margins and 16.3% revenue growth. UHS offers better value entry with a 40.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Morgan Stanley

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in the Morgan Stanley Building, Midtown Manhattan, New York City.

Universal Health Services Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American for-profit multinational managed healthcare and insurance company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It offers health care products and insurance services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?