WallStSmart

Morgan Stanley (MS)vsResMed Inc (RMD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Morgan Stanley generates 1221% more annual revenue ($73.17B vs $5.54B). RMD leads profitability with a 27.4% profit margin vs 24.7%. RMD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.23. RMD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

MS

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

RMD

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.5Value: 5.3Quality: 8.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 4.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MS.

RMDOvervalued (-13.1%)

Margin of Safety

-13.1%

Fair Value

$229.58

Current Price

$206.76

$22.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $229.58Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$299.95B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
40.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.6%

Profit MarginProfitability
24.7%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.3%8/10

16.3% revenue growth

RMD4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
35.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 35.3%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
25.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
27.4%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

MS3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.334/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-7.85B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

RMD0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MS

The strongest argument for MS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.7% and operating margin at 40.6%. Revenue growth of 16.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RMD

The strongest argument for RMD centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.4% and operating margin at 35.3%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MS

The primary concerns for MS are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : RMD

No major red flags identified for RMD, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MS profiles as a growth stock while RMD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

MS is growing revenue faster at 16.3% — sustainability is the question.

RMD generates stronger free cash flow (520M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 73/100), backed by strong 24.7% margins and 16.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Morgan Stanley

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in the Morgan Stanley Building, Midtown Manhattan, New York City.

ResMed Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & SUPPLIES · USA

ResMed is a San Diego, California-based medical equipment company. It primarily provides cloud-connectable medical devices for the treatment of sleep apnea (such as CPAP devices and masks), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other respiratory conditions.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?