WallStSmart

MP Materials Corp (MP)vsTernium SA ADR (TX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ternium SA ADR generates 5567% more annual revenue ($15.61B vs $275.46M). TX leads profitability with a 2.7% profit margin vs -31.2%. TX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

MP

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.13

TX

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 8.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MP.

TXUndervalued (+77.9%)

Margin of Safety

+77.9%

Fair Value

$205.14

Current Price

$42.76

$162.38 discount

UndervaluedFair: $205.14Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
70.0%10/10

Revenue surging 70.0% year-over-year

TX3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
-5.0%2/10

ROE of -5.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-109.26M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.132/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.9%3/10

ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.7%3/10

2.7% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 70.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TX

The strongest argument for TX centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.13 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : TX

The primary concerns for TX are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 2.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.68 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 70.0% — sustainability is the question.

TX generates stronger free cash flow (65M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TX scores higher overall (47/100 vs 28/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Ternium SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

Ternium SA manufactures and processes various steel products in Mexico, Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, Bolivia, Uruguay, Brazil, the United States, Colombia, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?