WallStSmart

MP Materials Corp (MP)vsTernium SA ADR (TX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ternium SA ADR generates 3745% more annual revenue ($16.00B vs $416.25M). TX leads profitability with a 4.4% profit margin vs -14.6%. TX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

MP

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.51

TX

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 7.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MPSignificantly Overvalued (-22.9%)

Margin of Safety

-22.9%

Fair Value

$44.19

Current Price

$50.51

$6.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $44.19Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TX.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
119.7%10/10

Revenue surging 119.7% year-over-year

TX6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
59.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 59.5% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
16.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.514/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-223.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TX4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
4.7%3/10

ROE of 4.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.4%3/10

4.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-175.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 119.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TX

The strongest argument for TX centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.13 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : TX

The primary concerns for TX are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 4.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.95 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 119.7% — sustainability is the question.

TX generates stronger free cash flow (-175M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TX scores higher overall (68/100 vs 30/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Ternium SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

Ternium SA manufactures and processes various steel products in Mexico, Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, Bolivia, Uruguay, Brazil, the United States, Colombia, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?