WallStSmart

MP Materials Corp (MP)vsTronox Holdings PLC (TROX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Tronox Holdings PLC generates 634% more annual revenue ($3.06B vs $416.25M). MP leads profitability with a -14.6% profit margin vs -19.2%. TROX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

MP

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.51

TROX

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MPSignificantly Overvalued (-22.9%)

Margin of Safety

-22.9%

Fair Value

$44.19

Current Price

$50.51

$6.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $44.19Overvalued
TROXUndervalued (+75.8%)

Margin of Safety

+75.8%

Fair Value

$34.73

Current Price

$4.42

$30.31 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.73Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
119.7%10/10

Revenue surging 119.7% year-over-year

TROX3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.7%8/10

18.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
48.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 48.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.514/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-223.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TROX4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$768.16M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-47.3%2/10

ROE of -47.3% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.772/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 119.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TROX

The strongest argument for TROX centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 18.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : TROX

The primary concerns for TROX are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.90 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TROX is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.95 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 119.7% — sustainability is the question.

TROX generates stronger free cash flow (60M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TROX scores higher overall (52/100 vs 30/100) and 18.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Tronox Holdings PLC

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Tronox Holdings plc is a vertically integrated manufacturer of TiO2 pigment in North America, South and Central America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?