WallStSmart

MP Materials Corp (MP)vsNutrien Ltd (NTR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nutrien Ltd generates 7633% more annual revenue ($26.88B vs $347.57M). NTR leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -20.5%. NTR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

MP

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.53

NTR

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MPSignificantly Overvalued (-55.4%)

Margin of Safety

-55.4%

Fair Value

$37.03

Current Price

$65.45

$28.42 premium

UndervaluedFair: $37.03Overvalued
NTRSignificantly Overvalued (-31.4%)

Margin of Safety

-31.4%

Fair Value

$55.61

Current Price

$67.20

$11.59 premium

UndervaluedFair: $55.61Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
118.6%10/10

Revenue surging 118.6% year-over-year

NTR4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
1250.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1250.0% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
13.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.0%8/10

19.0% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-79.28M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

NTR2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.734/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.13B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 118.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NTR

The strongest argument for NTR centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 19.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.21 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : NTR

The primary concerns for NTR are Altman Z-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while NTR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.84 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 118.6% — sustainability is the question.

MP generates stronger free cash flow (-79M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NTR scores higher overall (67/100 vs 28/100) and 19.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Nutrien Ltd

BASIC MATERIALS · AGRICULTURAL INPUTS · USA

Nutrien Ltd. provides inputs, services and solutions for crops. The company is headquartered in Saskatoon, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?