WallStSmart

Marcus Corporation (MCS)vsTKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. generates 600% more annual revenue ($5.06B vs $722.86M). TKO leads profitability with a 4.5% profit margin vs 2.0%. TKO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.43. TKO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

MCS

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.56

TKO

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.33
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MCSUndervalued (+40.3%)

Margin of Safety

+40.3%

Fair Value

$27.00

Current Price

$20.35

$6.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $27.00Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TKO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MCS2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
524.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 524.0% YoY

TKO3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
63.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 63.0% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
21.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.9%8/10

Revenue surging 25.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

MCS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.7%4/10

3.7% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.564/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$616.72M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
3.2%3/10

ROE of 3.2% — below average capital efficiency

TKO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

4.5% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.473/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MCS

The strongest argument for MCS centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : TKO

The strongest argument for TKO centers on EPS Growth, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 25.9% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.43 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MCS

The primary concerns for MCS are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. A P/E of 45.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TKO

The primary concerns for TKO are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. A P/E of 75.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MCS profiles as a value stock while TKO is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TKO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.62 — expect wider price swings.

TKO is growing revenue faster at 25.9% — sustainability is the question.

TKO generates stronger free cash flow (675M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TKO scores higher overall (63/100 vs 51/100) and 25.9% revenue growth. MCS offers better value entry with a 40.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Marcus Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ENTERTAINMENT · USA

Marcus Corporation owns and operates movie theaters, hotels and resorts in the United States. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ENTERTAINMENT · USA

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. is a sports and entertainment company. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?