WallStSmart

Mattel Inc (MAT)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 329% more annual revenue ($22.94B vs $5.35B). MAT leads profitability with a 7.4% profit margin vs 6.9%. SE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.59. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B-).

MAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 8.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.54

SE

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MATUndervalued (+34.3%)

Margin of Safety

+34.3%

Fair Value

$24.05

Current Price

$14.89

$9.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $24.05Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+53.2%)

Margin of Safety

+53.2%

Fair Value

$244.86

Current Price

$83.21

$161.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $244.86Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MAT2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.4%10/10

Revenue surging 38.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
58.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.2% YoY

Market CapQuality
$51.99B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.598/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

MAT4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-22.90M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$02/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.47 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 38.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.59 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MAT profiles as a value stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 38.4% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor LEISURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SE scores higher overall (70/100 vs 60/100) and 38.4% revenue growth. MAT offers better value entry with a 34.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?