WallStSmart

Mattel Inc (MAT)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 405% more annual revenue ($27.72B vs $5.49B). MAT leads profitability with a 7.8% profit margin vs 5.9%. MAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. MAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

MAT

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.56

SE

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MATUndervalued (+23.5%)

Margin of Safety

+23.5%

Fair Value

$20.65

Current Price

$14.01

$6.64 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.65Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+56.1%)

Margin of Safety

+56.1%

Fair Value

$260.75

Current Price

$106.24

$154.51 discount

UndervaluedFair: $260.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MAT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.978/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
48.1%10/10

Revenue surging 48.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$65.07B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.15B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

MAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.3%3/10

Operating margin of 1.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.373/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
41.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 10.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 48.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 41.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MAT profiles as a value stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.52 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 48.1% — sustainability is the question.

SE generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAT scores higher overall (63/100 vs 56/100) and 10.5% revenue growth. SE offers better value entry with a 56.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?