WallStSmart

Masco Corporation (MAS)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 4145% more annual revenue ($326.01B vs $7.68B). MAS leads profitability with a 10.9% profit margin vs 7.8%. XOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.22. MAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

MAS

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.35

XOM

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MAS.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-67.7%)

Margin of Safety

-67.7%

Fair Value

$82.16

Current Price

$149.92

$67.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $82.16Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MAS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
84.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 85 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
-13.6410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.0% YoY

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$584.11B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.23B8/10

Generating 2.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

MAS2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.874/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-113.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-43.4%2/10

Earnings declined 43.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MAS

The strongest argument for MAS centers on Return on Equity, Debt/Equity, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.22 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MAS

The primary concerns for MAS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MAS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.31 — expect wider price swings.

MAS is growing revenue faster at 6.5% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (2.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MAS scores higher overall (67/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Masco Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Masco Corporation is a manufacturer of products for the home improvement and new home construction markets.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?