WallStSmart

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 35% more annual revenue ($11.10B vs $8.21B). YUM leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs 14.2%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.90. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32

YUM

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LULUSignificantly Overvalued (-95.2%)

Margin of Safety

-95.2%

Fair Value

$90.10

Current Price

$158.72

$68.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.10Overvalued
YUMUndervalued (+38.8%)

Margin of Safety

+38.8%

Fair Value

$259.74

Current Price

$159.16

$100.58 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.74Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.908/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

YUM2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

YUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.964/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : YUM

The strongest argument for YUM centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 31.9%.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : YUM

The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU profiles as a value stock while YUM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

YUM is growing revenue faster at 6.5% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (960M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (65/100 vs 59/100). YUM offers better value entry with a 38.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Yum! Brands Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?