WallStSmart

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)vsWilliams Companies Inc (WMB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Williams Companies Inc generates 7% more annual revenue ($11.83B vs $11.10B). WMB leads profitability with a 22.1% profit margin vs 14.2%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.90. WMB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32

WMB

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 9.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LULUSignificantly Overvalued (-95.2%)

Margin of Safety

-95.2%

Fair Value

$90.10

Current Price

$158.72

$68.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.10Overvalued
WMBUndervalued (+29.0%)

Margin of Safety

+29.0%

Fair Value

$100.15

Current Price

$73.81

$26.34 discount

UndervaluedFair: $100.15Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.908/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

WMB4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
41.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
50.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 50.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$90.96B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
22.1%9/10

Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

WMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.474/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
34.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-485.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WMB

The strongest argument for WMB centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.1% and operating margin at 41.2%.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WMB

The primary concerns for WMB are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU profiles as a value stock while WMB is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

WMB is growing revenue faster at 8.7% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (960M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WMB scores higher overall (67/100 vs 65/100), backed by strong 22.1% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Williams Companies Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

The Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?