WallStSmart

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 355% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $11.10B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 14.2%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.90. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32

UL

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LULUSignificantly Overvalued (-95.2%)

Margin of Safety

-95.2%

Fair Value

$90.10

Current Price

$158.72

$68.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.10Overvalued
ULSignificantly Overvalued (-268.2%)

Margin of Safety

-268.2%

Fair Value

$20.26

Current Price

$60.80

$40.54 premium

UndervaluedFair: $20.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.908/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$132.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.914/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

LULU is growing revenue faster at 0.8% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (65/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?