WallStSmart

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 125% more annual revenue ($25.19B vs $11.20B). LULU leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 6.4%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.58. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

LULU

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12

SE

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LULUUndervalued (+70.7%)

Margin of Safety

+70.7%

Fair Value

$600.18

Current Price

$114.23

$485.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $600.18Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+53.1%)

Margin of Safety

+53.1%

Fair Value

$243.96

Current Price

$86.56

$157.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $243.96Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
46.6%10/10

Revenue surging 46.6% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$57.05B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-35.0%2/10

Earnings declined 35.0%

SE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
3.1%4/10

3.1% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$02/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 46.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.36 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU profiles as a value stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.57 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 46.6% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor APPAREL RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (64/100 vs 58/100). SE offers better value entry with a 53.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?