WallStSmart

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)vsRent the Runway Inc (RENT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 3100% more annual revenue ($11.20B vs $350.10M). LULU leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 8.5%. RENT trades at a lower P/E of 0.5x. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

LULU

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12

RENT

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 3.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -5.27
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LULUUndervalued (+70.7%)

Margin of Safety

+70.7%

Fair Value

$600.18

Current Price

$114.23

$485.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $600.18Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RENT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RENT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
0.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Debt/EquityHealth
-3.7010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.2%8/10

Revenue surging 29.2% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-35.0%2/10

Earnings declined 35.0%

RENT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$116.52M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-775.0%2/10

ROE of -775.0% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-5.20M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RENT

The strongest argument for RENT centers on P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 29.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : RENT

The primary concerns for RENT are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU profiles as a value stock while RENT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

RENT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

RENT is growing revenue faster at 29.2% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (64/100 vs 34/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Rent the Runway Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Rent the Runway, Inc. rents women's designer dresses, clothing and accessories through its stores and online platform.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?