WallStSmart

Live Ventures Inc (LIVE)vsMattel Inc (MAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 1164% more annual revenue ($5.49B vs $434.25M). MAT leads profitability with a 7.8% profit margin vs -0.6%. MAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

LIVE

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.02

MAT

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIVEUndervalued (+85.9%)

Margin of Safety

+85.9%

Fair Value

$138.16

Current Price

$8.08

$130.08 discount

UndervaluedFair: $138.16Overvalued
MATUndervalued (+23.5%)

Margin of Safety

+23.5%

Fair Value

$20.65

Current Price

$14.01

$6.64 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.65Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LIVE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MAT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.978/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LIVE4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$26.94M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
4.8%3/10

Operating margin of 4.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

MAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.3%3/10

Operating margin of 1.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.373/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LIVE

The strongest argument for LIVE centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 10.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LIVE

The primary concerns for LIVE are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.44 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LIVE profiles as a turnaround stock while MAT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LIVE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.03 — expect wider price swings.

MAT is growing revenue faster at 10.5% — sustainability is the question.

LIVE generates stronger free cash flow (5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAT scores higher overall (63/100 vs 30/100) and 10.5% revenue growth. LIVE offers better value entry with a 85.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Live Ventures Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Live Ventures Incorporated is engaged in flooring manufacturing, steel fabrication and retail businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Visit Website →

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?