WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsMattel Inc (MAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 15% more annual revenue ($5.38B vs $4.68B). MAT leads profitability with a 9.3% profit margin vs 4.3%. MAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. MAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FND

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.05

MAT

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+15.3%)

Margin of Safety

+15.3%

Fair Value

$81.36

Current Price

$47.41

$33.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $81.36Overvalued
MATUndervalued (+21.7%)

Margin of Safety

+21.7%

Fair Value

$20.18

Current Price

$14.08

$6.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

MAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.233/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.62 — expect wider price swings.

MAT is growing revenue faster at 4.3% — sustainability is the question.

FND generates stronger free cash flow (46M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MAT scores higher overall (56/100 vs 40/100). FND offers better value entry with a 15.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?