WallStSmart

Li Auto Inc (LI)vsLowe's Companies Inc (LOW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Li Auto Inc generates 16% more annual revenue ($104.79B vs $90.43B). LOW leads profitability with a 7.3% profit margin vs -4.4%. LOW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. LOW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

LI

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.78

LOW

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIUndervalued (+76.6%)

Margin of Safety

+76.6%

Fair Value

$82.13

Current Price

$11.81

$70.32 discount

UndervaluedFair: $82.13Overvalued
LOWSignificantly Overvalued (-36.2%)

Margin of Safety

-36.2%

Fair Value

$144.51

Current Price

$196.82

$52.31 premium

UndervaluedFair: $144.51Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LI1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LOW4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-5.6510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$110.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.12B8/10

Generating 3.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

LI4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.784/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.582/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.0%2/10

ROE of -7.0% — below average capital efficiency

LOW4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.3%3/10

7.3% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LI

The strongest argument for LI centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : LOW

The strongest argument for LOW centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LI

The primary concerns for LI are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : LOW

The primary concerns for LOW are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LI profiles as a turnaround stock while LOW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LOW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.85 — expect wider price swings.

LOW is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

LOW generates stronger free cash flow (3.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LOW scores higher overall (50/100 vs 33/100). LI offers better value entry with a 76.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Li Auto Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · China

Li Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Lowe's Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Lowe's Companies, Inc. is an American retail company specializing in home improvement. Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, the company operates a chain of retail stores in the United States and Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?