WallStSmart

Ford Motor Company (F)vsLi Auto Inc (LI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ford Motor Company generates 74% more annual revenue ($189.86B vs $109.37B). LI leads profitability with a -1.7% profit margin vs -3.2%. LI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.83. F earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

F

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 3.5Value: 3.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.91

LI

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 7.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FSignificantly Overvalued (-15.7%)

Margin of Safety

-15.7%

Fair Value

$12.21

Current Price

$14.90

$2.69 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.21Overvalued
LIUndervalued (+78.3%)

Margin of Safety

+78.3%

Fair Value

$88.38

Current Price

$14.20

$74.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $88.38Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

F3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
430.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 430.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$64.35B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LI3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

F4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
8.482/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-16.3%2/10

ROE of -16.3% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.06B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

LI4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.6%2/10

ROE of -2.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.4%2/10

Revenue declined 11.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-99.8%2/10

Earnings declined 99.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : F

The strongest argument for F centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Price/Book.

Bull Case : LI

The strongest argument for LI centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : F

The primary concerns for F are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.20 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : LI

The primary concerns for LI are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

F carries more volatility with a beta of 1.66 — expect wider price swings.

F is growing revenue faster at 6.4% — sustainability is the question.

LI generates stronger free cash flow (951M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AUTO MANUFACTURERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

F scores higher overall (53/100 vs 41/100). LI offers better value entry with a 78.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ford Motor Company

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Ford Motor Company, commonly known as Ford, is an American multinational automaker that has its main headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Li Auto Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · China

Li Auto Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and sells smart electric sport utility vehicles (SUVs) in China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?