WallStSmart

Lifetime Brands Inc (LCUT)vsWhirlpool Corporation (WHR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Whirlpool Corporation generates 2296% more annual revenue ($15.52B vs $647.93M). WHR leads profitability with a 2.1% profit margin vs -4.2%. LCUT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. LCUT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

LCUT

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.5Value: 6.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.84

WHR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LCUT.

WHRSignificantly Overvalued (-141.2%)

Margin of Safety

-141.2%

Fair Value

$38.49

Current Price

$55.22

$16.73 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.49Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LCUT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
104.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 104.8% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WHR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LCUT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.844/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$122.79M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.5%2/10

ROE of -12.5% — below average capital efficiency

WHR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.4%3/10

Operating margin of 3.4%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.9%2/10

Revenue declined 0.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LCUT

The strongest argument for LCUT centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WHR

The strongest argument for WHR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LCUT

The primary concerns for LCUT are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WHR

The primary concerns for WHR are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LCUT profiles as a turnaround stock while WHR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LCUT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

WHR is growing revenue faster at -0.9% — sustainability is the question.

WHR generates stronger free cash flow (1.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LCUT scores higher overall (57/100 vs 51/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lifetime Brands Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

Lifetime Brands, Inc. designs, sources, and sells brand-name cookware, dinnerware, and other products for use in the home in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Garden City, New York.

Visit Website →

Whirlpool Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

The Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances, headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?