WallStSmart

Lazard Ltd (LAZ)vsTradeweb Markets Inc (TW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lazard Ltd generates 51% more annual revenue ($3.10B vs $2.05B). TW leads profitability with a 39.6% profit margin vs 7.6%. LAZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. TW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

LAZ

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.87

TW

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 5.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LAZSignificantly Overvalued (-271.2%)

Margin of Safety

-271.2%

Fair Value

$14.76

Current Price

$40.90

$26.14 premium

UndervaluedFair: $14.76Overvalued
TWUndervalued (+34.8%)

Margin of Safety

+34.8%

Fair Value

$176.44

Current Price

$119.95

$56.49 discount

UndervaluedFair: $176.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LAZ2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
28.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

TW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
39.6%10/10

Keeps 40 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
42.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
128.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 128.8% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.6410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

LAZ4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.874/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-43.3%2/10

Earnings declined 43.3%

TW2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
2.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LAZ

The strongest argument for LAZ centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TW

The strongest argument for TW centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 39.6% and operating margin at 42.4%. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : LAZ

The primary concerns for LAZ are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TW

The primary concerns for TW are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LAZ profiles as a value stock while TW is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LAZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.37 — expect wider price swings.

TW is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

LAZ generates stronger free cash flow (400M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TW scores higher overall (67/100 vs 60/100), backed by strong 39.6% margins and 12.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lazard Ltd

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Lazard Ltd, is a financial advisory and asset management firm in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Central and South America. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.

Tradeweb Markets Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Tradeweb Markets Inc. creates and operates electronic marketplaces in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and internationally.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?