Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsLazard Ltd (LAZ)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$841.84
+0.73%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $250.66B
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
$40.90
+3.68%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $3.88B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 1817% more annual revenue ($59.40B vs $3.10B). GS leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 7.6%. LAZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).
GS
Strong Buy73
out of 100
Grade: B
LAZ
Buy60
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+52.4%
Fair Value
$1768.48
Current Price
$841.84
$926.64 discount
Margin of Safety
-271.2%
Fair Value
$14.76
Current Price
$40.90
$26.14 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 38.3%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
15.2% revenue growth
Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Grey zone — moderate risk
7.6% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 43.3%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 38.3%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : LAZ
The strongest argument for LAZ centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : LAZ
The primary concerns for LAZ are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a growth stock while LAZ is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
LAZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.37 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.
LAZ generates stronger free cash flow (400M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 60/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Lazard Ltd
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Lazard Ltd, is a financial advisory and asset management firm in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Central and South America. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.
Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?