Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsLazard Ltd (LAZ)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$1,029.18
+0.92%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $299.67B
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
$41.10
-1.84%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $4.29B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 2012% more annual revenue ($67.57B vs $3.20B). GS leads profitability with a 31.0% profit margin vs 7.1%. LAZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 83/100 (A-).
GS
Exceptional Buy83
out of 100
Grade: A-
LAZ
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 42.2%
Revenue surging 42.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 92.3% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
0.1% revenue growth
7.1% margin — thin
Operating margin of 4.8%
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.0% and operating margin at 42.2%. Revenue growth of 42.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : LAZ
The strongest argument for LAZ centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 6.04 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : LAZ
The primary concerns for LAZ are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.35 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a growth stock while LAZ is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
LAZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.42 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 42.5% — sustainability is the question.
GS generates stronger free cash flow (5.6B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (83/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 31.0% margins and 42.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Lazard Ltd
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Lazard Ltd, is a financial advisory and asset management firm in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Central and South America. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.
Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?