WallStSmart

Kura Sushi USA Inc (KRUS)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 3025% more annual revenue ($9.59B vs $306.89M). QSR leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs -0.6%. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

KRUS

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.31

QSR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KRUS.

QSRUndervalued (+25.4%)

Margin of Safety

+25.4%

Fair Value

$94.75

Current Price

$72.66

$22.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KRUS3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
34.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 34.5% YoY

QSR3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
25.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
25.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.9%

Areas to Watch

KRUS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$553.70M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.8%2/10

ROE of -0.8% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-10.01M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

QSR2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.191/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KRUS

The strongest argument for KRUS centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.28 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KRUS

The primary concerns for KRUS are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.19 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KRUS profiles as a growth stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KRUS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.34 — expect wider price swings.

KRUS is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (169M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kura Sushi USA Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. operates Japanese restaurants with technology in the United States. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?