WallStSmart

Koppers Holdings Inc (KOP)vsMP Materials Corp (MP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Koppers Holdings Inc generates 440% more annual revenue ($1.88B vs $347.57M). KOP leads profitability with a 4.1% profit margin vs -20.5%. KOP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

KOP

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.20

MP

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KOPUndervalued (+1.2%)

Margin of Safety

+1.2%

Fair Value

$34.64

Current Price

$43.09

$8.45 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.64Overvalued
MPSignificantly Overvalued (-55.4%)

Margin of Safety

-55.4%

Fair Value

$37.03

Current Price

$65.45

$28.42 premium

UndervaluedFair: $37.03Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KOP2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
118.6%10/10

Revenue surging 118.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

KOP4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$792.74M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

4.1% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
9.992/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-79.28M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KOP

The strongest argument for KOP centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 118.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KOP

The primary concerns for KOP are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KOP profiles as a value stock while MP is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.84 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 118.6% — sustainability is the question.

KOP generates stronger free cash flow (35M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KOP scores higher overall (49/100 vs 28/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Koppers Holdings Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Koppers Holdings Inc. offers treated wood products, wood treatment chemicals, and carbon compounds in the United States, Australasia, Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?